nav emailalert searchbtn searchbox tablepage yinyongbenwen piczone journalimg journalInfo journalinfonormal searchdiv searchzone qikanlogo popupnotification paper paperNew
Effects of caved coal and rock on adsorption and release of characteristic pollutants in mine water from the Pingdingshan Mining Area
Email: luoqingyt@126.com
DOI: 10.13637/j.issn.1009-6094.2026.0548
Published:   2026-08-04
Publication Date:   2026-08-04
Online:   2026-08-04
Mobile reading
Abstract:

This study examines the influence of caved coal-rock masses on the migration and release of characteristic pollutants, such as Fe and Pb, in mine water. First, the composition, structure, and surface element distribution of coal and gangue were comprehensively characterized using SEM mapping, XRD, XRF, and IR techniques. Subsequently, static immersion experiments were conducted to assess various influencing factors, including different pH values, immersion times, and particle sizes of coal and rock. The migration and release patterns of Fe and Pb ions were determined using ICP analysis. Finally, low-temperature nitrogen adsorption experiments were performed to elucidate the mechanisms underlying the migration and release of these pollutants. The results indicate that: (1) In deionized water, gangue is the primary source of Fe ions, with the amount released influenced by particle size and immersion time; specifically, smaller particle sizes lead to higher Fe release during the initial immersion stage. The source of Pb ions is affected by the combined action of coal and gangue; while the presence of gangue enhances Pb release, no significant relationship was found between the amount of Pb released and gangue content. (2) Under mine water conditions, coal has minimal impact on the concentration of Fe ions in the water, and other ions present inhibit the release rate of Fe from gangue; Pb release is jointly regulated by both coal and gangue. (3) Low-temperature nitrogen adsorption experiments reveal that the migration and release of metal ions such as Fe and Pb in mine water are significantly influenced by the pore structures of coal and gangue. In summary, controlling iron pollution in mine water should focus on the particle size of gangue and the inhibitory effects of other ions on iron release, whereas lead pollution control requires a comprehensive consideration of the interactions between coal and gangue. This study provides a theoretical basis and technical support for the in-situ purification and resource utilization of mine water.

References

[1]孙亚军, 张莉, 徐智敏, 等. 煤矿区矿井水水质形成与演化的多场作用机制及研究进展[J]. 煤炭学报, 2022, 47(1): 423–437.

[2]Wood S C, Younger P L, Robins N S. Long-term changes in the quality of polluted mine water discharges from abandoned underground coal workings in Scotland[J]. Quarterly Journal of Engineering Geology, 1999, 32(1): 69–79.

[3]孙亚军, 徐智敏, 李鑫, 等. 我国煤矿区矿井水污染问题及防控技术体系构建[J]. 煤田地质与勘探, 2021, 49(5): 1–16.

[4]顾大钊. 煤矿地下水库理论框架和技术体系[J]. 煤炭学报, 2015, 40(2): 239–246.

[5]徐东晶, 马如月, 张智超. 废弃煤矿矿井水水质演化成因机制: 以神东矿区项目工程为例[J]. 科学技术与工程, 2025, 25(1): 430–438.

[6]令狐昌卫, 寸得欣, 尹林虎, 等. 滇东典型煤矿区地表水地下水化学特征及控制因素[J]. 科学技术与工程, 2023, 23(32): 13728–13740.

[7]许开卿, 乔伟, 李文平, 等. 深部岩溶矿井水化学特征及含水层水力联系研究[J]. 煤矿安全, 2023, 54(8): 150–160.

[8]GB 20426—2006 煤炭工业污染物排放标准[S].

[9]霍丙杰, 李涛, 陈建平, 等. 冻土地区矿井水来源的水化学及环境同位素分析[J]. 安全与环境学报, 2024, 24(6): 2147–2156.

[10]范常浩. 锦界煤矿采空区破碎煤岩体净水机理实验研究[D]. 徐州: 中国矿业大学, 2022.

[11]李云, 郭泽周, 原鑫, 等. 垮落煤岩体对矿井水净化效果试验研究[J]. 煤炭工程, 2025, 57(10): 179–185.

[12]苏琛, 吴敏, 唐佳伟, 等. 神东矿区顶板垮落岩体在不同水化学条件下的离子迁移特征[J]. 煤炭学报, 2023, 48(3): 1353–1364.

[13]杨光. 寒武灰岩地热水中氡的赋存特征及影响因素研究[D]. 焦作: 河南理工大学, 2018.

[14]赵东, 张海波, 于航, 等. 深井高温高湿工作面热害治理研究及工程应用[J]. 煤矿现代化, 2024, 33(2): 59–63.

[15]董绍楠. 水溶液中铝离子水解–络合反应和铝矿物溶解机制的密度泛函理论研究[D]. 南京: 南京大学, 2019.

[16]路凯旋, 罗庆, 罗洁, 等. 煤岩体对矿井水常规阳离子演化规律的影响[J]. 重庆大学学报, 2026, 49(6): 14–23.

[17]刘波. 某铀矿山尾矿中有害金属元素的迁移、阻滞及机理研究[D]. 绵阳: 西南科技大学, 2017.

[18]张万涛, 王巧, 高安仕, 等. 污染场地中多组分重金属的污染特征与蒙脱石吸附机制研究[J/OL]. 工程地质学报: 1–8[2026–05–23]. https://doi.org/10.13544/j.cnki.jeg.2025-0113.

[19]高一宁. 铁氧化物转化过程中的镉分配及同位素分馏机制[D]. 贵阳: 贵州大学, 2025.

[20]周文龙, 杨胜兴, 李汝红, 等. 喀斯特地区煤矿酸性废水(AMD)综合治理研究[J]. 中国煤炭地质, 2023, 35(2): 33–40, 52.

[21]范雨竹, 王媛, 王林燕, 等. 氧化石墨烯基吸附材料去除水体中Pb(Ⅱ): 制备、性能及机理[J]. 无机材料学报, 2026, 41(1): 12–26.

[22]冯光俊, 王猛, 朱炎铭, 等. ScCO2–水作用下页岩纳米孔与吸附性能演变机制[J]. 煤田地质与勘探, 2026, 54(1): 142–157.

[23]赵洪宇. 难选铁矿石促进富油煤热解及铁矿物回收技术研究[D]. 北京: 中国矿业大学(北京), 2016.

[24]李锦文, 吴惠明, 陈永亨. 矿山酸性排水静态预测与评价[J]. 广州大学学报(自然科学版), 2008(4): 60–63.

[25]秦利鸿. 磷酸钙矿物—有机酸溶液界面的纳米级溶解反应动力学及机制研究[D]. 武汉: 华中农业大学, 2016.

[26]Nihonyanagi S, Yamaguchi S, Tahara T. Counterion effect on interfacial water at charged interfaces and its relevance to the Hofmeister series[J]. Journal of the American Chemical Society, 2014, 136: 6155–6158.

Basic Information:

DOI:10.13637/j.issn.1009-6094.2026.0548

China Classification Code:X752

Citation Information:

[1]Lu Kaixuan,Luo Qing,Sun Daoning ,et al.Effects of caved coal and rock on adsorption and release of characteristic pollutants in mine water from the Pingdingshan Mining Area[J].Journal of Safety and Environment().DOI:10.13637/j.issn.1009-6094.2026.0548.

Fund Information:

国家重点研发计划资助项目(2024YFC3013904); 深地工程智能建造与健康运维全国重点实验室开放基金课题(SDGZ2527); 煤矿冲击地压机理与防控技术国家矿山安全监察局重点实验室开放基金项目(KFJJ–2025–0011); 辽宁省“兴辽英才计划”项目(XLYC2203141)

Published:  

2026-08-04

Publication Date:  

2026-08-04

Online:  

2026-08-04

Search Advanced Search