| 51 | 0 | 27 |
| Downloads | Citas | Reads |
To investigate the atomization and flow field characteristics of a traditional straight-blade half-inch centrifugal water mist nozzle and a newly designed structurally optimized airfoil-blade counterpart, a comprehensive series of experimental tests and numerical simulations was systematically conducted. The experimental phase utilized a custom-built closed-loop water circulation testing platform integrated with a high-precision Phase Doppler Particle Analyzer (PDPA), enabling accurate, real-time measurement of various macroscopic and microscopic spray parameters. Specifically, fluid flow rate, spray angle, maximum average axial velocity, and droplet diameter distribution were evaluated under varying inlet pressure conditions ranging from 0.5 MPa to 4.0 MPa. Concurrently, to uncover internal flow mechanisms that are not easily observed in physical experiments, Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD) simulations were performed using Fluent software. The numerical model incorporated the RNG k–ε turbulence model coupled with the Volume of Fluid (VOF) multiphase framework to capture complex air-water interface dynamics. We simulated internal static pressure variations, velocity distributions of the internal flow field, and outlet cross-sectional velocity profiles for both nozzle geometries under extended inlet pressures from 1.0 MPa to 6.0 MPa. The empirical data demonstrate that the optimized nozzle significantly enhances fluid throughput. Within the tested pressure range, its flow rate increased by 20% to 35% compared to the traditional design, peaking at a maximum flow difference of 1.039 m³/h under the 2.0 MPa working condition. Furthermore, the airfoil-blade structure exhibits a broader operational range for the spray angle, contracting from 78.8° to 46°, which provides a distinct spatial coverage advantage, particularly around the 1.5–2.0 MPa pressure interval. Interestingly, regarding droplet size distribution, a crossover effect was observed: the traditional straight-blade nozzle generates finer droplets at lower pressures (0.5–2.5 MPa), while the optimized nozzle demonstrates superior atomization performance at higher pressures exceeding 3.0 MPa. Both designs successfully achieved effective droplet velocities surpassing 50 m/s once system pressure reached 3.5 MPa. From a numerical perspective, simulation results illustrate that structural optimization significantly smooths the internal pressure gradient; specifically, at the extreme pressure of 6.0 MPa, the local pressure drop across the blades is reduced by approximately 57%. This research provides a theoretical basis and data accumulation for the selection and structural optimization of water mist nozzles, serving as a valuable reference for dust protection in mining operations.
[1] 陈晓坤, 王君, 程方明. 氢气抑爆材料及其抑爆机理研究进展[J]. 爆炸与冲击, 2024, 44(11): 16–40.
[2] 景国勋, 穆璐璐. 煤矿瓦斯爆炸事故统计分析及应急管理研究[J]. 安全与环境学报, 2023, 23(10): 3657–3665.
[3] 牛国庆, 马亚男, 贾海林. 超细水雾抑制预混可燃气爆炸超压的衰减模型[J]. 安全与环境学报, 2025, 25(2): 447–456.
[4] Gan Bo, Li Bei, Jiang Haipeng, et al. Suppression of polymethyl methacrylate dust explosion by ultrafine water mist/additives[J]. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 2018, 351: 346–355.
[5] Cao Xingyan, Wang Zhirong, Lu Yawei, et al. Numerical simulation of methane explosion suppression by ultrafine water mist in a confined space[J]. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, 2021, 109: 103777.
[6] Song Yifan, Zhang Qi. Quantitative research on gas explosion inhibition by water mist[J]. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 2019, 363: 16–25.
[7] 马纪闯, 荆德吉, 李亚斌, 等. 掘进巷道超微细水雾降尘技术研究及工程试验[J]. 安全与环境学报, 2025, 25(12): 4677–4684.
[8] Tan Wei, Lü Dong, Liu Liyan, et al. Suppression of methane/air explosion by water mist with potassium halide additives driven by CO_(2)[J]. Chinese Journal of Chemical Engineering, 2019, 27(11): 2742–2748.
[9] 黄子超, 薛少谦. 细水雾特性及煤粉制备系统抑尘抑爆技术研究[J]. 矿业安全与环保, 2022, 49(6): 73–78.
[10] 冯萧. 超细水雾抑制甲烷/煤尘两相爆炸机理研究[D]. 大连: 大连理工大学, 2022: 58–69.
[11] 胡立双, 刘洋, 杨亚军, 等. 水雾对RDX粉尘爆炸的抑制作用[J]. 爆炸与冲击, 2024, 44(5): 158–168.
[12] 周建伟. 内部结构参数对离心喷嘴雾化性能影响的研究[D]. 南京: 南京航空航天大学, 2020: 17–76.
[13] 陈庆, 魏旭, 陈光, 等. 不同压力下细水雾雾场特征参量模拟研究[J]. 消防科学与技术, 2020, 39(6): 803–806.
[14] 高媛媛, 黄晓家, 谢水波, 等. 离心式细水雾喷嘴结构设计和参数优化[J]. 消防科学与技术, 2013, 32(1): 50–52.
[15] Tonini S, Conti P, Cossali G E. Numerical modelling of internal flow in water mist injectors: effect of nozzle geometry and operating conditions[J]. Fire Technology, 2019, 55(6): 2395–2417.
[16] 吴永诚, 苗峰, 黎义斌, 等. 基于RNG k–ε模型的竖板绕流数值模拟[J]. 四川建筑科学研究, 2014, 40(4): 21–25.
[17] Macías-Hernández M J, Dávila-Maldonado O, Guzmán-Vargas A, et al. CFD simulation of interfacial instability from the nozzle in the formation of viscous core-annular flow[J]. Canadian Journal of Chemical Engineering, 2016, 94(10): 2004–2012.
Basic Information:
DOI:10.13637/j.issn.1009-6094.2026.0793
China Classification Code:TD714.4;X964
Citation Information:
[1]Zhou Wen,Wang Jinxi,Tang Xinyu ,et al.Research on flow field characteristics of centrifugal half-inch water mist nozzle for explosion suppression[J].Journal of Safety and Environment().DOI:10.13637/j.issn.1009-6094.2026.0793.
Fund Information:
中国博士后科学基金面上项目(2023M733276); 山西省基础研究计划项目(202303021212202); 太原工业学院引进人才科研项目(2023KJ042)
2026-09-07
2026-09-07
2026-09-07