| 88 | 0 | 56 |
| Downloads | Citas | Reads |
Based on Self-Determination Theory, this study constructed an indicator system comprising 25 evaluation metrics across five dimensions(external regulation, introjected regulation, identified regulation, integrated regulation, and intrinsic motivation) to investigate the multidimensional motivational composition and influencing mechanisms of aviation safety confidential reporting behavior among civil aviation practitioners. The objective is to optimize the effectiveness of confidential reporting systems and improve both the quantity and quality of reports. Through a combined methodology of questionnaire surveys and statistical analysis, the research empirically examined the influence of different motivational dimensions on reporting behavior among airline employees. The results demonstrate that:(1) the confidential safety reporting behavior among civil aviation personnel is significantly influenced by five distinct regulatory factors, revealing a sophisticated multi-level motivational framework that governs their reporting decisions and actions;(2) current reporting practices are predominantly driven by external regulation and introjected regulation mechanisms, while autonomous motivation forms—particularly identified regulation and intrinsic motivation—remain substantially underdeveloped, resulting in suboptimal outcomes in both reporting frequency and information quality;(3) a quality-oriented incentive mechanism, a non-punitive safety culture, and value guidance coupled with behavioral internalization constitute the key pathways for transforming employees' voluntary reporting behavior from passive compliance to active engagement. The findings reveal the complex interplay between controlled and autonomous motivations in influencing reporting behavior and highlight the need for organizations to develop targeted strategies that enhance autonomous motivations through systematic interventions. These include redesigning incentive structures to emphasize quality over quantity, fostering an organizational culture that genuinely values and acts upon safety reports without fear of reprisal, and implementing communication and training programs that help employees internalize the importance of reporting for safety improvement. Ultimately, these efforts will contribute to more effective safety management systems in the aviation industry through increased frequency and quality of confidential safety reports.
[1] 崔振新，孙宠.航空公司一线员工自愿报告意愿影响因素研究[J].安全与环境学报，2018,18(4):1408-1412.Cui Zhenxin,Sun Chong.The influential factors of the front-line staff members of the civil aviation airline company[J].Journal of Safety and Environment,2018,18(4):1408-1412.
[2] Sieberichs S,Kluge A.Why pilots voluntarily report self-inflicted incidents:a qualitative study with aviation safely experts[J].Aviation Psychology and Applied Human Factors,2021,11(2):98-111.
[3] Daniel K A,Samuel A A,Nana Y O,et al.Development of a Generative Voluntary Safety Reporting Culture (GVSRC) model for the Gulf of Mexico (GOM) Oil and Gas (O & G) sector using attributes of the Aviation Safety Action Program (ASAP)[J].Safety Science,2023,161:106073.
[4] Karanikas N.Evaluating the horizontal alignment of safety management activities through cross-reference of data from safety audits,meetings and investigations[J].Safety Science,2017,98:37-49.
[5] 孙瑞山.航空安全自愿报告系统[J].中国民用航空，2002(8):42-44.Sun Ruishan.Establishing Chinese confidential aviation safety reporting system[J].China Civil Aviation,2002(8):42-44.
[6] 齐晓云，王燕青，刘思飞.民航安全信息个体自愿报告意愿的影响因素研究[J].工业安全与环保，2016,42(4):5-8,22.Qi Xiaoyun,Wang Yanqing,Liu Sifei.Study on the influencing factors of individual voluntary reporting intention of civil aviation safety information[J].Industrial Safety and Environmental Protection,2016,42(4):5-8,22.
[7] 郑秀梅，马国毓.民航员工安全信息自愿报告意愿的促进路径：基于模糊集定性比较分析[J].中国安全科学学报，2024,34(1):62-69.Zheng Xiumei,Ma Guoyu.Promotion path of civil aviation employees' willingness to share safety information:based on fsQCA[J].China Safety Science Journal,2024,34(1):62-69.
[8] Fogg B J.A behavior model for persuasive design[C]//Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Persuasive Technology,April 26,2009,Claremont,USA.New York:ACM,2009:1-7.
[9] 马骁，周劲波.用户创新者产生用户创业行为的过程组态分析：基于福格行为模型[J].中国人力资源开发，2025,42(3):66-84.Ma Xiao,Zhou Jinbo.Exploring the process of user innovators generating user entrepreneurial behavior:a configuration analysis based on the Fogg behavior model[J].Human Resources Development of China,2025,42(3):66-84.
[10] 蒋丽，张意如，李锋.自主安全动机与安全绩效的多水平模型[J].心理科学进展，2019,27(7):1141-1152.Jiang Li,Zhang Yiru,Li Feng.A multilevel model of autonomous safety motivation and safety performance[J].Advances in Psychological Science,2019,27(7):1141-1152.
[11] Jiang Li,Tetrick L E.Mapping the nomological network of employee self-determined safety motivation:a preliminary measure in China[J].Accident Analysis & Prevention,2016,94:1-7.
[12] Scott N,Fleming M,Kelloway E K.Understanding why employees behave safely from a self-determination theory perspective[M].New York:Oxford University Press,2014:276-279.
[13] Kolekofski J,Keith E,Heminger A R.Beliefs and attitudes affecting intentions to share information in an organizational setting[J].Information & management,2003,40(6):521-532.
[14] Ryan R M,Deci E L.Basic psychological needs theory:satisfaction and frustration of autonomy,competence,and relatedness in relation to psychological wellness and full functioning[M].New York:The Guilford Press,2017:239-271.
[15] Ryan R M,Deci E L.From ego depletion to vitality:theory and findings concerning the facilitation of energy available to the self[J].Social and Personality Psychology Compass,2008,2(2):702-717.
[16] 万莉，程慧平.基于自我决定理论的虚拟知识社区用户持续知识贡献行为动机研究[J].情报科学，2016,34(10):15-19.Wan Li,Cheng Huiping.Research on motivation of users' continuous knowledge contribution behavior in virtual knowledge community based on self-determination theory[J].Information Science,2016,34(10):15-19.
[17] 李阳，朱立涛，谢阳群.基于Logistic回归模型的信息传递意愿影响因素研究[J].情报理论与实践，2013,36(8):35-40.Li Yang,Zhu Litao,Xie Yangqun.A study on influencing factors of information sharing intention based on Logistic regression model[J].Information Studies:Theory & Application,2013,36(8):35-40.
[18] Fernet C,Gagne M,Austin S.When does quality of relationships with coworkers predict burnout over time?The moderating role of work motivation[J].Journal of Organizational Behavior,2010,31(8):1163-1180.
[19] Preenen P T Y,Oeij P R,Dhondt S,et al.Why job autonomy matters for young companies' performance:company maturity as a moderator between job autonomy and company performance[J].World Review of Entrepreneurship,Management and Sustainable Development,2016,12(1):74-100.
[20] 王莉芳，周妹和.基于均方差决策法的水资源可持续利用评价：以天津市为例[J].未来与发展，2014,38(11):40-44,14.Wang Lifang,Zhou Meihe.Evaluation on water resources sustainable utilization based on MSE decision method:a case study of Tianjin[J].Future and Development,2014,38(11):40-44,14.
[21] Satty T L.Decision making with the analytic hierarchy process[J].International Journal of Services Sciences,2008,1(1):83-98.
[22] 镇常青.多目标决策中的权重调查确定方法[J].系统工程理论与实践，1987(2):16-24,30.Zhen Changqing.Methods for determining weights in surveys for multi-objective decision making[J].Systems Engineering:Theory & Practice,1987(2):16-24,30.
[23] 王宗军.多目标权系数赋值方法及其选择策略[J].系统工程与电子技术，1993(6):35-41,34.Wang Zongjun.Multiobjective weights assigning methods and their choice strategies[J].Journal of Systems Engineering and Electronics,1993(6):35-41,34.
[24] 严鸿和，陈玉祥，许昭明，等.专家评分机理与最优综合评价模型[J].系统工程理论与实践，1989(2):19-23.Yan Honghe,Chen Yuxiang,Xu Zhaoming,et al.Expert scoring mechanism and the optimal comprehensive evaluation model[J].Systems Engineering:Theory & Practice,1989(2):19-23.
[25] 王应明，傅国伟.运用无限方案多目标决策方法进行有限方案多目标决策[J].控制与决策，1993(1):25-29.Wang Yingming,Fu Guowei.Using Multiobjective decision making method to make decision for multiattributes[J].Journal of Control and Decision,1993(1):25-29.
Basic Information:
DOI：10.13637/j.issn.1009-6094.2025.1323
China Classification Code:V328
Citation Information:
[1]Liu Junjie,Tian Pengcheng,Chen Ze.Research on influencing factors of confidential reporting behavior based on self-determination theory[J].Journal of Safety and Environment,2026,26(08):3153-3161.DOI:10.13637/j.issn.1009-6094.2025.1323.
Fund Information:
中国民用航空局安全能力建设项目(ASSA2023/17)
2026-08-19
2026-08-19