nav emailalert searchbtn searchbox tablepage yinyongbenwen piczone journalimg journalInfo journalinfonormal searchdiv searchzone qikanlogo popupnotification paper paperNew
Dynamic risk assessment of underground heating pipe galleries based on game theory-based combined weighting
Email:
DOI: 10.13637/j.issn.1009-6094.2025.1885
Published:   2026-09-03
Publication Date:   2026-09-03
Online:   2026-09-03
Mobile reading
Abstract:

Addressing the conflict between subjective and objective weights in the risk assessment of underground heating pipe galleries, as well as the lack of dynamics in traditional models, this study proposes a dynamic assessment method that integrates game theory-based combined weighting with residual-driven feedback correction. This integrated framework explicitly acknowledges the evolving nature of infrastructure risks by establishing a closed-loop, self-optimizing evaluation system. First, initial subjective and objective weight sets are constructed using three methods: the G1 method (Order Relationship Analysis Method) determines subjective weights based on expert insights to identify implicit risks such as weld defects; the improved entropy weight method captures data discreteness; and the CRITIC (Criteria Importance Through Intercriteria Correlation) method integrates data variability and inter-indicator correlation to form complementary objective weights, mitigating the limitations of single-method approaches. Subsequently, game theory combined weighting achieves collaborative optimization by minimizing the Euclidean distance between the combined weight vector and the three initial sets, resulting in the Nash equilibrium between subjective experience and objective data. To enhance dynamics, a residual-driven multi-stage feedback correction mechanism is designed: each phase calculates the relative residual between predicted and actual risk levels, which dynamically adjusts the subjective weight coefficient via an exponential decay function and updates cloud model parameters (Ex, En, He). This continuous adaptation mechanism ensures that the assessment model remains synchronized with the real-time degradation process and environmental variations of the pipe gallery system throughout its operational lifecycle. Using a case study of a 12.3 km DN1200 heating pipe gallery in Hebei Province, results indicate that Section 2 in the old urban silty clay layer is the highest-risk priority, with a risk score of 52.5. Operation and maintenance indicators exhibit the highest sensitivity, contributing 35% to total risk. The subjective weight coefficient decays from 0.5 to 0.001, thereby reducing reliance on expert experience. The comprehensive score achieved by the proposed method (0.975 9) outperforms the G1 method (0.874 3), improved entropy weight method (0.703 1), and CRITIC method (0.892 4) by 12.3%, 8.7%, and 10.1%, respectively. This method effectively identifies high-risk sections and dominant factors, providing scientific support for full-life-cycle safety management of underground heating pipe galleries.

References

[1] 马杰. 高密度城区地下综合管廊建设技术探究[J]. 现代工程科技, 2025, 4(16): 13–16.

[2] 史一棋, 刘洪超, 孙立极. 优化地下管线增强城市韧性[N]. 人民日报, 2024–10–14(7).

[3] 杨玉皓. 市政地下综合管廊施工中的风险识别方法及仿真研究[J]. 中国高新科技, 2025(5): 68–70.

[4] 章静. 城市地下空间地下管廊与城市空间规划可持续性评估策略[J]. 城市建设理论研究(电子版), 2025(3): 16–18.

[5] 郗文彬, 吕志成, 杨京生. 河北雄安新区综合管廊系统性建设关键经验[J]. 给水排水, 2025, 61(6): 117–122.

[6] 韩庆文, 唐培峰. 城市地下管廊建设: 看深圳“特区经验”[N]. 广东建设报, 2025–06–24(2).

[7] Zhang Jinping, Li Xuechun, Zhang Haorui, et al. Urban waterlogging risk assessment in Zhengzhou based on the coupling land surface hazard-pregnant features and underground pipe network operation characteristics[J]. Journal of Hydrology: Regional Studies, 2025, 59: 102416.

[8] Zhu Xiaoping, Wu Jiansong, Bai Yiping, et al. Integrating FBN and FDS for quantitative risk assessment of cable fire in utility tunnel[J]. Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries, 2024, 88: 105266.

[9] 郭振超, 王林, 王一丁, 等. 综合管廊运维多灾害事故致因分析与风险管控研究[J]. 灾害学, 2025, 40(3): 104–110, 144.

[10] 高聪聪, 王晓丽, 徐爽. 基于AHP法和熵值法的城市地下综合管廊基坑施工风险研究[J]. 价值工程, 2024, 43(29): 48–50.

[11] 陆婷. 基于BIM与AHP的地下综合管廊深基坑支护安全风险研究[J]. 价值工程, 2023, 42(31): 4–6.

[12] Hai Nan, Gong Daqing, Liu Shifeng, et al. Dynamic coupling risk assessment model of utility tunnels based on multimethod fusion[J]. Reliability Engineering and System Safety, 2022, 228: 108773.

[13] 张魁文. 基于云模型的G市H路地下综合管廊施工风险评价研究[D]. 赣州: 江西理工大学, 2024: 9.

[14] 胡义焕, 韩静媛, 赖健维. 基于模糊综合评价与危险性分析法的施工安全风险评价[J]. 科技创新与应用, 2023, 13(29): 116–120.

[15] 陈雍君, 李晓健, 张丽, 等. 故障树和模糊贝叶斯网络在管廊运维风险评估中的应用研究[J]. 安全与环境学报, 2024, 24(3): 857–866.

[16] 宗翔, 张冬梅, 黄宏伟. 博弈论在隧道及地下工程风险应对中的应用[J]. 地下空间与工程学报, 2012, 8(增刊2): 1764–1767, 1776.

[17] 涂圣文, 赵振华, 邓梦雪, 等. 基于组合赋权–后悔理论的城市综合管廊运维总体风险评估[J]. 安全与环境工程, 2020, 27(6): 160–167.

[18] 韩雨宏, 郭志明. 基于博弈论–贝叶斯网络的地下综合管廊风险评价[J]. 工程经济, 2024, 34(8): 31–45.

[19] Bai Yiping, Wu Jiansong, Liu Kunqi, et al. Energy-based Coupling Risk Assessment (CRA) model for urban underground utility tunnels[J]. Reliability Engineering and System Safety, 2024, 250: 110255.

[20] Xue Gang, Liu Shifeng, Ren Long, et al. Risk assessment of utility tunnels through risk interaction-based deep learning[J]. Reliability Engineering and System Safety, 2024, 241: 109670.

[21] 蒋红. 基于模糊贝叶斯网络的综合管廊施工安全风险评估[J]. 黑龙江工程学院学报, 2025, 39(4): 47–54.

[22] 张蓓, 谢昱姝, 白光, 等. 基于AHP–熵权法组合赋权的供热管网风险评估方法研究[J]. 工业安全与环保, 2023, 49(12): 12–17.

[23] 姚天野, 刘威. 基于AHP-熵权法组合赋权的燃气管网风险评估方法研究[J]. 结构工程师, 2019, 35(6): 93–101.

[24] 王乐鑫. 青岛市H路综合管廊工程施工阶段风险评价研究[D]. 青岛: 青岛理工大学, 2024: 4.

[25] 孙文霞, 雷俊, 乔建刚, 等. 基于博弈组合赋权–TOPSIS的山区公路桥梁可靠性评价方法[J]. 世界桥梁, 2025, 53(4): 55–61.

[26] 侯公羽, 马骁赟, 孙晓荣, 等.基于组合赋权–云模型的抽水蓄能电站综合效益评价[J/OL]. 工程科学与技术, 2025: 1–15[2025–09–20]. https://link.cnki.net/urlid/51.1773.TB.20250513.0946.002.

[27] 贺正纲. PPP项目绩效评价研究: 以Y市地下管廊PPP项目为例[D]. 银川: 北方民族大学, 2023: 4.

[28] 官艺园. 城市地下综合管廊PPP项目运维绩效评价[D]. 武汉: 武汉理工大学, 2020: 9.

Basic Information:

DOI:10.13637/j.issn.1009-6094.2025.1885

China Classification Code:TU995.3

Citation Information:

[1]Liu Yufeng,Zhang Xiaojian,Xie Wei ,et al.Dynamic risk assessment of underground heating pipe galleries based on game theory-based combined weighting[J].Journal of Safety and Environment().DOI:10.13637/j.issn.1009-6094.2025.1885.

Fund Information:

河北省住房和城乡建设厅建设科技示范项目(2023041)

Published:  

2026-09-03

Publication Date:  

2026-09-03

Online:  

2026-09-03

Search Advanced Search