nav emailalert searchbtn searchbox tablepage yinyongbenwen piczone journalimg journalInfo journalinfonormal searchdiv searchzone qikanlogo popupnotification paper paperNew
2026, 08, v.26 2959-2968
Research on a cloud model for assessing airport runway incursion risk using integrated weighting
Email:
DOI: 10.13637/j.issn.1009-6094.2025.1533
Published:   2026-06-02
Publication Date:   2026-06-02
Online:   2026-06-02
Mobile reading
Abstract:

In response to the current inadequacies in quantitative assessment methodologies for runway incursion risks, which hinder the accurate identification of high-risk segments in airport operational management and contribute to frequent safety incidents and operational efficiency constraints, this study proposes an integrated cloud model framework based on integrated weighting principles for refined risk identification. By systematically applying the Latent Dirichlet Allocation(LDA) topic modeling technique, thematic elements and relevant keywords were extracted from a comprehensive collection of 122 global runway incursion accident investigation reports spanning the past two decades. The derived thematic content underwent rigorous validation by a panel of aviation safety experts, ultimately establishing a well-structured runway incursion risk indicator system comprising four primary indicators—human factors, communication failures, airport environment, and management factors—along with 24 carefully defined secondary indicators. Regarding the weighting methodology, an improved Analytic Hierarchy Process(AHP) was employed to calculate subjective weights for each indicator, while the Kendall concordance coefficient was utilized to verify the reliability of these weight assignments. Simultaneously, the enhanced entropy weight method was implemented to derive objective weights based on data characteristics. Through the application of game theory principles, the final combined weights were determined to be 0.153 for subjective dimensions and 0.847 for objective dimensions, respectively. The validity of these final indicator weights was further confirmed through both additive and multiplicative combinatorial weighting approaches. Utilizing the cloud model as the theoretical foundation for risk quantification, empirical data from four representative Chinese airports were selected for comprehensive model validation: a 4E-category airport in North China, a 4F-category airport in East China, a 4C-category airport in Southwest China, and a 3C-category airport in Northwest China. The validation results demonstrated risk level assessments of medium-high(0.665), medium-low(0.553), medium-low(0.715), and medium-high(0.628), respectively, showing strong alignment with actual operational conditions. Furthermore, the model exhibited satisfactory stability under various parameter variations, providing valuable practical references for targeted improvements in specific risk factors across different airport environments, ultimately contributing to the effective reduction of runway incursion risks.

References

[1] Mathew J K,Major W L,Hubbard S M,et al.Statistical modelling of runway incursion occurences in the United States[J].Journal of Air Transport Management,2017 ,65:54-62.

[2] 徐一旻,田梦莹,李治,等.FTA-BN在机场跑道入侵事故影响因素分析中的应用[J].安全与环境学报,2023,23(5):1361-1367.Xu Yimin,Tian Mengying,Li Zhi,et al.Analysis of influencing factors of airport runway incursion accident based on FTA-BN[J].Journal of Safety and Environment,2023,23(5):1361-1367.

[3] 牟奇锋,郭花,郝芮.基于复杂网络的跑道侵入风险因素研究[J].计算机与数字工程,2024,52(3):814-820.Mou Qifeng,Guo Hua,Hao Rui.Research on risk factors of runway incursion based on complex network[J].Computer & Digital Engineering,2024,52(3):814-820.

[4] 许桂梅,黄圣国.基于改进关联函数的跑道侵入风险可拓评价[J].人类工程学,2010,16(4):56-59.Xu Guimei,Huang Shengguo.Extenics assessment toward runway incursion risk based on the improved correlation function[J].Chinese Journal of Ergonomics,2010,16(4):56-59.

[5] 罗军,林雪宁,李易.跑道侵入严重等级的算法研究及其应用[J].安全与环境学报,2013,13(4):227-231.Luo Jun,Lin Xuening,Li Yi.Research on the algorithms of runway incursion severity classification and its application[J].Journal of Safety and Environment,2013,13(4):227-231.

[6] Stroeve S H,Som P,Doorn B A V,et al.Strengthening air traffic safety management by moving from outcome-based towards risk-based evaluation of runway incursions[J].Reliability Engineering & System Safety,2016,147:93-108.

[7] 焦卫东,王瑞冬,姚军强,等.跑道侵入与冲突检测的共形几何代数描述[J].航空学报,2022,43(5):483-492.Jiao Weidong,Wang Ruidong,Yao Junqiang,et al.Conformal geometric algebra description of runway incursion and conflict detection[J].Acta Aeronautica et Astronautica Sinica,2022,43(5):483-492.

[8] 吴维,吴泽萱,王兴隆,等.融合强化学习的DBN跑道侵入风险预测[J].中国安全科学学报,2024,34(7):20-27.Wu Wei,Wu Zexuan,Wang Xinglong,et al.Research on DBN incorporating reinforcement learning for runway intrusion risk prediction[J].China Safety Science Journal,2024,34(7):20-27.

[9] Blei D M,Ng A Y,Jordan M I.Latent dirichlet allocation[J].The Journal of Machine Learning Research,2003,3:993-1022.

[10] Kim D,Yang Hanmo.Evaluation of the risk frequency for hazards of runway incursion in Korea[J].Journal of Air Transport Management,2012,23:31-35.

[11] Saaty R W.The analytic hierarchy process:what it is and how it is used[J].Mathematical Modelling,1987,9(3/4/5):161-176.

[12] 唐晓阳,肖焕雄.导流方案目标权重的确定及定性目标量化[J].长江科学院院报,1995,12(4):1-6.Tang Xiaoyang,Xiao Huanxiong.Rational definition of objective weight coefficients and quantification of qualitative objectives in multiobjective decision of diversion schemes[J].Journal of Yangtze River Scientific Research Institute,1995,12(4):1-6.

[13] 周惠成,张改红,王国利.基于熵权的水库防洪调度多目标决策方法及应用[J].水利学报,2007,38(1):100-106.Zhou Huicheng,Zhang Gaihong,Wang Guoli.Multi-objective decision making approach based on entropy weights for reservoir flood control operation[J].Journal of Hydraulic Engineering,2007,38(1):100-106.

[14] Marden J R,Shamma J S.Game theory and control[J].Annual Review of Control,Robotics,and Autonomous Systems,2018,1:105-134.

[15] 朱倩,周红宇,张敏祥.基于改进熵权-云模型的果园运输小车适应性评价研究[J].科学技术与工程,2023,23(36):15420-15426.Zhu Qian,Zhou Hongyu,Zhang Minxiang.Adaptability evaluation of orchard transporter based on improved entropy weight cloud model[J].Science Technology and Engineering,2023,23(36):15420-15426.

[16] 贺佳伟,邵垒,杨文举,等.基于多指标评估云模型的车载动力锂电池火灾风险研究[J].科学技术与工程,2023,23(20):8901-8906.He Jiawei,Shao Lei,Yang Wenju,et al.Fire safety of vehicle power lithium battery based on multi-index assessment cloud model[J].Science Technology and Engineering,2023,23(20):8901-8906.

[17] 谷雨轩,徐常凯,倪彬.基于组合赋权云模型的阻力伞保障风险评估[J].科学技术与工程,2022,22 (24):10787-10795.Gu Yuxuan,Xu Changkai,Ni Bin.Risk assessment of resistance umbrella support based on combined weighted cloud model[J].Science Technology and Engineering,2022,22(24):10787-10795.

[18] 聂羿.跨座式单轨车辆运营安全评估方法研究[D].重庆:重庆交通大学,2022.Nie Yi.Research on the safety assessment method of straddle monorail vehicle operation[D].Chongqing:Chongqing Jiaotong University,2022.

[19] 张宇辉,胡思睿,常鑫.飞机雷雨情景着陆冲出跑道风险预警模型[J].科学技术与工程,2024,24(33):14491-14501.Zhang Yuhui,Hu Sirui,Chang Xin.Risk early warning model for aircraft runway overturn during thunderstorm landing scenarios[J].Science Technology and Engineering,2024,24(33):14491-14501.

[20] 杨永斌,王庆,王轶君,等.基于组合赋权-EAHP-NCM模型理论的层状围岩隧道风险评估计算[J].中外公路,2023,43(4):209-216.Yang Yongbin,Wang Qing,Wang Yijun,et al.Risk assessment calculation for layered surrounding rock tunnels based on the combined weighting-EAHP-NCM model theory[J].Journal of China and Foreign Highway,2023,43(4):209-216.

Basic Information:

DOI:10.13637/j.issn.1009-6094.2025.1533

China Classification Code:V328;V355

Citation Information:

[1]Zhang Yuhui,Sun Zeyuan,Liao Shujiao.Research on a cloud model for assessing airport runway incursion risk using integrated weighting[J].Journal of Safety and Environment,2026,26(08):2959-2968.DOI:10.13637/j.issn.1009-6094.2025.1533.

Fund Information:

中央高校基本科研基金项目(3122025103)

Published:  

2026-06-02

Publication Date:  

2026-06-02

Online:  

2026-06-02

Search Advanced Search