nav emailalert searchbtn searchbox tablepage yinyongbenwen piczone journalimg journalInfo journalinfonormal searchdiv searchzone qikanlogo popupnotification paper paperNew
Quantitative HAZOP risk assessment based on steady-State fluid-structural coupling simulation: a case study of a shell-and-tube heat exchanger
Email:
DOI: 10.13637/j.issn.1009-6094.2025.2092
Published:   2026-09-10
Publication Date:   2026-09-10
Online:   2026-09-10
Mobile reading
Abstract:

Traditional hazard and operability (HAZOP) analysis relies heavily on expert judgment and lacks quantitative evidence when evaluating structural risks in shell-and-tube heat exchangers, often resulting in ambiguous and experience-dependent consequence descriptions. To address this limitation, this study proposes a systematic methodology that integrates steady-state fluid–thermal–structural sequential coupling simulations into the HAZOP framework to enable quantitative, mechanics-based risk assessment of structural integrity. A detailed three-dimensional numerical model of a fixed tube-sheet heat exchanger is constructed using the ANSYS Workbench platform, incorporating realistic geometric features and temperature-dependent material properties of 304 stainless steel. Steady-state computational fluid dynamics (CFD) simulations are first conducted to solve the Reynolds-averaged Navier–Stokes equations with the shear stress transport (SST) k–ω turbulence model, thereby obtaining the flow field and conjugate heat transfer temperature distributions under both nominal and deviation conditions. The resulting temperature and pressure fields are subsequently transferred as thermal and mechanical loads to a finite element structural model, where thermoelastic equilibrium equations are solved to determine equivalent stress distributions and total deformation. A dedicated risk assessment matrix is established by integrating the computed safety factor—defined as the ratio of material yield strength to maximum equivalent stress—with a region-specific sensitivity classification that distinguishes primary, secondary, and peak stress zones in accordance with pressure vessel design codes. Eight deviation scenarios are designed based on HAZOP guidewords, encompassing variations in cold and hot fluid mass flow rates (0.7–2.8 kg/s) and inlet temperatures (0–100 ℃). Simulation results demonstrate that temperature-induced deviations exert the most pronounced influence on structural integrity. Notably, the cold fluid inlet at 0 ℃ yields a maximum equivalent stress of 274 MPa and a safety factor of 0.8, corresponding to an extremely high risk level, while a hot fluid inlet at 100 ℃ results in 242 MPa and a safety factor of 0.91. In contrast, flow rate deviations induce comparatively moderate stress variations (102–177 MPa) and lower risk rankings. The proposed methodology not only aligns closely with empirical engineering judgment but also transforms qualitative HAZOP consequence descriptions into explicit, data-driven risk classifications, thereby providing robust, quantitative support for risk-based inspection planning and proactive safety management of shell-and-tube heat exchangers.

References

[1] 王中原,傅瑶,邹杨,等.管壳式熔盐换热器折流板开孔数值分析 [J].工程热物理学报,2022,43(10):2790-2797.

[2] 李芳国,张贝克,高东.HAZOP知识图谱构建方法[J].化工进展,2021,40(08):4666-4677.

[3] 程方明,蒋萌,苏畅,等. 加氢站泄漏燃爆事故的动态贝叶斯风险分析 [J]. 安全与环境学报,2024,24 (09): 3405-3417.

[4] Ramesh V,Venkat V. Digraph-based models for automated HAZOP analysis[J].Reliability Engineering & System Safety,1995,50:33-49.

[5] Ehab E,Osama M. Evaluating natural language processing algorithms for improved hazard and operability analysis[J].Geodata and AI,2025,4:100026.

[6] Ali E,Mehrdad B,Davood R. Predicting possible recommendations related to causes and consequences in the HAZOP study worksheet using natural language processing and machine learning: BERT, clustering, and classification[J]. Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries,2024,89:105310.

[7] Dowell A M III. Layer of protection analysis for determining safety integrity level[J]. International Society of Automation Transactions, 1998, 37(3):155-165.

[8] Khakzad N, Khan F, Amyotte P. Safety analysis in process facilities: comparison of fault tree and Bayesian network approaches[J]. Reliability Engineering & System Safety,2011,96(8):925-932.

[9] Wang Zheng, Wang Jinjiang, Guan Pengting, Song Weihang. SIL assessment of in-service safety instrumented systems in the chemical industry based on FBN-LOPA[J]. Process Safety and Environmental Protection,2025,195:106740.

[10] 陈海岭,蒋军成,虞奇,等. Aspen Plus模拟计算在苯硝化HAZOP风险分析中的应用 [J]. 中国安全科学学报,2015,25(09):115-120.

[11] 贺元骅,吴际,安秋泽,等. 飞行中航空器投水行为规律演化机理研究[J].安全与环境学报,2026,26(04): 1459-1467.

[12] 陈真汕,虞斌,陈帅康,等. 壳程内置错位折流板流动传热特性数值模拟[J]. 压力容器,2025,42(05):46-55

[13] 郭超,魏超,史强,等. 基于流固耦合的蒸汽发生器传热管结构应力分析[J]. 压力容器,2025,42(02):38-45.

[14] 杨刚,欧晨希,陈新辉,等. 基于ANSYS的储氢气瓶快充温升流热固耦合模拟研究[J]. 真空,2024,61(03):26-32.

[15] MENTER F R,KUNTZ M,LANGTRY R. Ten years of industrial experience with the SST turbulence model[J]. Turbulence,Heat and Mass Transfer,2003,4(1):625-632.

[16] 王勇,李明,王雪,等. 基于熵产理论的管道泵流动损失特性分析[J]. 农业工程学报,2024,40(20):72-80.

[17] 聂昌达,陈志博,刘新健,等. 泡沫金属折流板换热器流动换热特性研究[J]. 工程热物理学报,2025,46(10):3337-3345

[18] 李新禹,陈林,郝旭涛,等. 基于FLUENT的板翅式换热器平直翅片数值模拟[J]. 化学工程,2018,46(04):62-67.

[19] 孟雪,荆恒铸,曹真真,等. 基于Aspen EDR的管壳式换热器的设计[J]. 化工进展,2019,38(S1):275-277.

[20] 蒋武,杨俊涛,黄梓文,等. HAZOP与风险矩阵结合的安全分析在煤气柜系统中的应用[J]. 工业安全与环保,2023,49(07):37-40

[21] 申勇峰,李晓旭,薛文颖,等. 304不锈钢拉伸变形过程中的马氏体相变[J]. 东北大学学报(自然科学版),2012,33(08):1125-1128.

Basic Information:

DOI:10.13637/j.issn.1009-6094.2025.2092

China Classification Code:TK172

Citation Information:

[1]MA Hanpeng,YU Jialiang,YANG Tiejun ,et al.Quantitative HAZOP risk assessment based on steady-State fluid-structural coupling simulation: a case study of a shell-and-tube heat exchanger[J].Journal of Safety and Environment().DOI:10.13637/j.issn.1009-6094.2025.2092.

Published:  

2026-09-10

Publication Date:  

2026-09-10

Online:  

2026-09-10

Search Advanced Search